We all have our little theory about the strange finish to Chris Nolan ’s Inception . Now the director is at long last speak out on the equivocal ending , but only to order us all that we ’re all very , very wrong .
In the remnant you may hear Cobb ’s top topple over thus raise that he ’s not in a dream , Nolan ’s reply : “ This gives Cobb a base - communication channel realness . But he ’s an untrustworthy narrator . ”
So a non - answer really . What about the fact that Cobb ’s children are wear the same clothes in his dreams and in the climax ? Plus they have n’t senesce at all ? Clearly THIS proves that he is in a dream . Nolan ’s response : “ The kids are not wear the same clothes at the end ! And they do long time ! We were make with two sets of kids . ”
But what about the fact that Cobb is clearly not bet at the top in the end ? Does that mean he does n’t care if it ’s a dream or reality he ’s happy , so understandably it is a dream or else why else show that ? Nolan ’s reception : “ The authoritative thing is that Cobb ’s not looking at the top . He does n’t care . ”
Ok what if just the ENDING is a dream and Saito and Cobb are still stuck together in the pipe dream world , so they ’ve make up one’s mind to build their own world together , where everything works out ? Nolan ’s response : “ Uh … that ’s not how I would have take the flick . ”
The idiomatic expression “ leap of religious belief ” is duplicate over and over do many masses to trust that the whole movie is really an human activity of Inception . Nolan ’s response : “ I do n’t mean I ’m going to severalise you about this . ”
To scan more possibility - smashing pick up the new Wired Magazine , publication 18.12 .
[ Thanks toColliderfor signal this out ]
Chris NolanMoviestheories
Daily Newsletter
Get the best technical school , scientific discipline , and culture news in your inbox daily .
News from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
