This C. W. Post was originally published January 5 , 2015 , but this year ’s 2nd round of Facebook warning are very similar , so everything still lend oneself .
This calendar week , you may have noticed a upsurge in Facebook ally posting an alarmist message on their walls insisting that they wo n’t give Facebook license to practice and distribute the substance they post . The message is either the same or very similar toanother viral copy - and - pastethat has circulated on the societal connection for the retiring few geezerhood . It ’s 2015 , but there ’s the same oldcomplete misapprehension of cerebral place lawbeing spread around .
It ’s not clear who first put up the viral message , but it has been aroundsince at least 2012 , and resurfaces whenever Facebook pull in change to is privacy policies ( to be clear , Facebook has nothing to do with the content beyond providing a platform for it to propagate ) . It ’s a modern twist on the strand letter of the alphabet , tap concealment concerns .
The in vogue looping of the message , sometimes prefaced by the poster with “ Better safe than no-account ” or a promissory note that the person saw this on the news , go like this :
OK . This assertion contains so many wackadoo falsity of varying intensities that it ’s hard to lie with where to come out . That beginning :
I do not give Facebook or any entity associated with Facebook permission to use my video , entropy , or post , both past and futurity .
If you use Facebook , you perfectly give Facebook permission to distribute content you carry . consort to Facebook’sStatement of Rights and Responsibilities , updated in 2013 , yougive the company“a non - exclusive , assignable , sub - licensable , royalty - free , world-wide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connectedness with Facebook . ” Contrary to what this message insist , Facebook already has permission to use your pictures , data , and post , both retiring and hereafter .
If you blue-pencil something , the party ca n’t expend it any longer … unless it has been shared by others . Facebook has built an umbrella of permissions with the expressed aim of using your photos , video recording , and post to promote itself . These are permissions you give upon signing up .
Posting that you do not give Facebook license does not change the fact that , in using Facebook , you do . Facebook could even use the post you just made about how you do n’t give it permit to use your posts . You ca n’t do ex post facto , unilateral takebacks on a insurance you hold to when you signed up for Facebook just by post something on Facebook . That ’d be like squall “ We are disassociate and our prenup is invalid ! ! ! ” through a speaker unit at your married person and expecting it to impact your legal marital condition .
By this statement I give notice to Facebook it is purely forbidden to disclose , transcript , pass out or take any other action against me ground on this visibility is individual and confidential information .
This sentence just straight up does n’t make sense from a grammatical standpoint .
The misdemeanor of privacy can be punished by natural law ( UCC 1 - 308 - 11 308 - 103 and Rome statute ) .
This isthe most meaningless nuggetin a cornucopia of dumb . UCC ( Uniform Commercial Code ) 1 - 308 - 11 308 - 103 has , as Snopespointed out , “ long been democratic amongconspiracy buffswho falsely maintain that cite it above your signature tune on an instrument will confer upon you the power to invoke extraordinary effectual rights . ” Facebook take advantage of the privacy terms exploiter agree to when they signalise up is not punishable by legal philosophy .
The “ Rome statute ” refers to a statute of the International Criminal Court . It establishes genocide , warfare crimes , offense of aggressiveness , and crime against humanity . It countenance the ICC to prosecute these types of offense if the commonwealth involved are unwilling or unable to do so .
This intend that this message suggests that Facebook exercise the permissions it has been given falls under the same legal power as external genocide investigations . Coool .
NOTE : Facebook is now a public entity .
Nah . Facebook is a publicly traded company . A “ public entity ” is a governmental creation . Also what the fuck does it matter ? Public entities can still do things you have given them permit to do .
Again , in no situation does a wall C. W. Post on Facebook retroactively retract permissions deed over to the ship’s company upon signing up for its services .
We ’re never going to get to a stop where every single tier - school acquaintanceship you see on Facebook blockade posting this trash , even if Mark Zuckerberg went on a door - to - doorway information crusade . No matter how transparent a fellowship ’s policy are , there will always be people who just are n’t going to pay up aid . But the persistence of these utterly off - mark rallying yell suggests that the companystill has a lot of work to doto make its users understand even in a panoptic mother wit what permit they award while using Facebook and its burgeon app family .
Do n’t let the conspiracy idealogue win . Do n’t place that message .
FacebookPrivacy
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , scientific discipline , and culture news in your inbox daily .
newsworthiness from the future , delivered to your present .
Please select your desired newssheet and subject your e-mail to upgrade your inbox .
You May Also Like
